The Sri Subramaniam Temple in Batu Caves
Another political ploy?
The recent demonstration by about 300 people against the
construction of a 29 storey condominium near the iconic Sri Subramaniar Temple
in Batu Caves opens up another controversy that was created and is being by capitalized
by politicians with the approaching general elections.It is strange that the
very people who who approved the project
in 2007 are now publically demonstrating against it being implemented by
another party.
The reason given for their opposition to the high rise condominium
is that it is too close to pose a danger to the temple which is the focus of
hundreds of thousands of pilgrims every year from all over the world. They are
also deeply concerned of its unfavourable effects on the surrounding
environment.
While admitting that citizens have right to demonstrate against
any project they feel will be harmful to the people and environment, some
questions remain as to the timing and the people who are demonstrating against
it. Why was there no official complaints whatsoever since the project was
approved five years ago? Why is that that the very people involved in its
approval are now vehemently against it? Why has the temple committee allowed it
to be manipulated by members of the ruling party led by none other than the
former Works Minister?
The initial reaction by representatives of the Selangor government
as usual was to engage in a blame game and absolving themselves from any responsibility
as the project was approved and implemented by BN in 2007. The issue is not
about who is responsible but whether things were done in accordance with the
laws and in good faith with the welfare of the people at heart. Obviously this
issue is being politicized where both BN and PR are blaming each other for
approving the project.
However the prompt intervention by Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri
Khalid Ibrahim to issue a stop-work order and a review of the project by
neutral experts is commendable as by delaying action things may become ugly and
racially exploited by our opportunistic politicians. It was a right and timely move by Khalid to stop the escalation of
the blame game.
Khalid’s decision may not be politically expedient but it is the
right thing to do.Far too long we had leaders who placed political expediency
above righteousness and Khalid’s action brings some reassurance to the people
whose must prevail at all times. The people must always be the winner in any
dispute between politicians and their parties.
The Batu Caves condo controversy reveals a gross defect in our
system of administration – irresponsible local councilors who are subservient
to their political masters who appointed them. It is time for our local councilors
to be democratically elected by the people to truly represent their interests and
not theirs or their political masters.
1 comment:
Isn't there some planning guideline based on some Approved Master Plan for the Area? The Master Plan would have been scrutinise by everybody before approval?
Do we leave approvals to the whims and fancies of civil servants or their masters? When projects are approved and then stopped, who is responsible to compensate?
Post a Comment