http://www.thestar.com.my/Opinion/Columnists/Musings/Profile/Articles/2014/04/24/When-the-world-turns-upside-down/
Common courtesy has been poisoned by those with nothing better to do than to
think of endless ways to be rude to others.
IN recent times I have felt like Alice in Wonderland. In Lewis Carroll’s
tale, Alice falls down a rabbit hole and suddenly the whole world is turned
upside down
.
She either becomes too small or too big, and all the odd characters around
her speak in riddles. The world of Wonderland is a very puzzling place.
The world I live in too has become a very puzzling place. Things mean
differently from what they used to, and reason and logic are no longer what
they were.
Once upon a time, being kind to others was a very good thing to be. We were
taught by parents and teachers to be nice to others regardless of who they
were, because how we behaved was a direct reflection of how we were brought up.
We were also taught to be fair to others, to not take what was not ours and
to be considerate to those who were older and wiser than us.
Today we are told that while being kind is still a good thing, we have to
mind who we are nice to. Being considerate and polite to some people is now
considered a mortal sin simply because they believe in things differently from
us.
We cannot, for instance, wish that a dead person rests in peace because
apparently having not believed in the same faith as we do, they cannot possibly
have a peaceful afterlife.
While in all likelihood the dead person will not know what we wished them,
there is still the living family and loved ones to consider. Surely we should
not add to their sorrow by wishing their deceased husband or father ill in the
afterlife. Not unless we want them to dislike us.
What was once just harmless common courtesy has now been poisoned by those
with nothing better to do than to think of endless ways to be rude to others.
Happiness today is defined by how many people you can make unhappy each day.
When we lost all those people in MH370, did anyone differentiate between
which families they sent their sympathies to and which ones they didn’t? Didn’t
that tragedy affect everybody equally?
Aren’t the families of MH370 now all forever linked to one another by this
common disaster, regardless of who they are and where they come from?
Yet the loss of one person to an equally tragic car accident (as well as his
assistant) was treated as if it was cause for celebration. Where once people
were mindful not to show their ill feelings publicly, today they are advertised
proudly. The world down that rabbit hole has come to the surface.
In a time not too far away, people thought that the cutting of hands and the
stoning of humans were too uncivilised for a modern democratic country like
ours. When some tried to introduce it, it was greeted with derision.
Today, even the most unlikely people are welcoming it as if it is the answer
to all our problems. Is it because people we admire because they have lots of
money have now decided that they will impose such barbaric punishments on their
citizens and non-citizens alike?
For what reason do we admire this move when, apart from conspicuous
consumption, there is absolutely nothing else to say about that country?
Why do we choose to ignore that this new “justice system” exempts the elite
from the same punishments they want to impose on everyone else?
Is that why our elite are also rushing to endorse this new move? Because
they know that it will not affect them at all, only those who are poor and
marginalised as well as those whom they dislike?
What sort of society do we foresee when the poor are left crippled because
they cannot afford to get justice from this system so many are now eager to
introduce? If it is meant to be better than what we have now, what do these
improvements look like?
What, for example, would be the equivalent of the Domestic Violence Act in
the hudud laws? Or will it be completely void because in a pure “Islamic” state,
men will be able to beat their wives with impunity?
Today, reason is being chiselled away daily only to be replaced by religious
gamesmanship, with no thought for what the consequences will be. Everyone is
trying to outdo one another with ever more “religious” pronouncements, even
though so little of it makes any sense at all.
Is a religious state merely about punishing people? How does such a state
deal with practical issues like globalisation or climate change, or even more
mundane domestic issues like our water woes, public transport or even
education?
Or is the answer simply to be like the Queen of Hearts and say “Off with his
head!”?